by:
1
SF works, described the future of the universe of war, except those of the 12 Super Robot save the Earth, the regular army general of the regular army, there are basically two models: One is uniformly warships on warships, a+warships of the small aircraft ( "small aircraft"terminology: carrier-based aircraft)
"Xingjian drivers": warships on warships, not carrier-based aircraft.
"Galactic Empire": mainly warships, supplemented by carrier-based aircraft.
"Robotech": supplemented by warships, the main carrier-based aircraft.
"Galactic Empire": mainly warships, supplemented by carrier-based aircraft.
"Robotech": supplemented by warships, the main carrier-based aircraft.
So long since I have such a question: the future of the universe real war, in the end is one of those forms? Ultimately the battle between the carrier-based aircraft? Or simply do not have access to carrier-based aircraft is the warships fighting?
"Galactic Empire"is basically the fighting warships
"Robotech"carrier-based aircraft fighting between mainly
2
this issue for a very long time do not want to understand, because knowledge is not enough because what is more important is the follow do not know what ideas to consider. Later in the online search and read many posts but it could not find any answer, we tend to 1960, not a system, unified view. After all, part of the YY.
Thought was a problem: consider the future of the universe whether it is necessary war carrier-based aircraft, then why take into account modern warfare needs of carrier-based aircraft, which is the role of the aircraft carrier.
What role on the aircraft carrier, all out with perhaps a lot. Read a lot of data and found that all comes down to the final then one of the most fundamental areas: the carrier-based aircraft carrier a combat radius of the ship than the range of the missile. Its tactical logic is: because the combat radius, therefore defeat the enemy before their enemies can kill first.
this issue for a very long time do not want to understand, because knowledge is not enough because what is more important is the follow do not know what ideas to consider. Later in the online search and read many posts but it could not find any answer, we tend to 1960, not a system, unified view. After all, part of the YY.
Thought was a problem: consider the future of the universe whether it is necessary war carrier-based aircraft, then why take into account modern warfare needs of carrier-based aircraft, which is the role of the aircraft carrier.
What role on the aircraft carrier, all out with perhaps a lot. Read a lot of data and found that all comes down to the final then one of the most fundamental areas: the carrier-based aircraft carrier a combat radius of the ship than the range of the missile. Its tactical logic is: because the combat radius, therefore defeat the enemy before their enemies can kill first.
Carrier-based aircraft is a combat radius of about 1,000 to 1,500 kilometers, the range of the missile is about 100 to 300 kilometers. So the aircraft carrier vs ordinary warships, the aircraft carrier warship hit before, the carrier-based aircraft carrier has been in the range of from the other side of the kill. This is because only the need for the aircraft carrier, a carrier-based aircraft is the necessity.
3
then the same logic, war is how the universe like?
Naval warfare, the impact of shells by the gravity of the limited range. But in the universe, because there is no gravity, or the type of laser used, so the range is no problem, it will lose its carrier-based aircraft to provide long-distance operations of the utility. The question is, how do you know that the future wars will use laser like?
Finally, the problem is reduced to:have to know what the two sides of weapons, as well as weapons of various parameters, in the absence of these basic facts before the decision to go on with carrier-based aircraft is not meaningless , even if it is discussed SF works.is behind the reference to "set the world tactical decision"principle. For example, SF
works related to the universe whether there will be any war carrier-based aircraft, the fact is not only a range of issues, there are two big problems.
Point is that the defense of warships and carrier-based aircraft attacks of their respective terms.
Reality of naval warfare, carrier-based aircraft VS ships and warships could not help but fight, in the 23 bombs will soon end. In the future, the universe of war, if the warships "protective layer"?. This is very common in the SF works, if the warships capable of producing a protective layer, offset by the majority of carrier-based aircraft attack capability, then the existence of carrier-based aircraft will disappear, can only rely on to greater output of the warship attack "primary guns,"and weapons. Instead, ships, no protective layer, or carrier-based aircraft Although small attack force also big enough, the only way, carrier-based aircraft will need for its existence.
Another point is the cable enemy warship, the hit rate.
Reality of naval warfare, carrier-based aircraft VS ships, warships is not waiting for the bombing, but also anti-aircraft guns like, but the movie can see these organs guns on the enemy's claim the naked eye, hit rate not 100%, carrier-based aircraft are fully utilized. However, the universe will be this war? A person wearing spacesuits on top of warships to the naked eye aimed at Fort fighter jets flying over
3
then the same logic, war is how the universe like?
Naval warfare, the impact of shells by the gravity of the limited range. But in the universe, because there is no gravity, or the type of laser used, so the range is no problem, it will lose its carrier-based aircraft to provide long-distance operations of the utility. The question is, how do you know that the future wars will use laser like?
Finally, the problem is reduced to:have to know what the two sides of weapons, as well as weapons of various parameters, in the absence of these basic facts before the decision to go on with carrier-based aircraft is not meaningless , even if it is discussed SF works.is behind the reference to "set the world tactical decision"principle. For example, SF
works related to the universe whether there will be any war carrier-based aircraft, the fact is not only a range of issues, there are two big problems.
Point is that the defense of warships and carrier-based aircraft attacks of their respective terms.
Reality of naval warfare, carrier-based aircraft VS ships and warships could not help but fight, in the 23 bombs will soon end. In the future, the universe of war, if the warships "protective layer"?. This is very common in the SF works, if the warships capable of producing a protective layer, offset by the majority of carrier-based aircraft attack capability, then the existence of carrier-based aircraft will disappear, can only rely on to greater output of the warship attack "primary guns,"and weapons. Instead, ships, no protective layer, or carrier-based aircraft Although small attack force also big enough, the only way, carrier-based aircraft will need for its existence.
Another point is the cable enemy warship, the hit rate.
Reality of naval warfare, carrier-based aircraft VS ships, warships is not waiting for the bombing, but also anti-aircraft guns like, but the movie can see these organs guns on the enemy's claim the naked eye, hit rate not 100%, carrier-based aircraft are fully utilized. However, the universe will be this war? A person wearing spacesuits on top of warships to the naked eye aimed at Fort fighter jets flying over
original link:http://wfwfang.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!66338926106EFDF6!2521.entry
No comments:
Post a Comment