Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Why only popular science articles, but not G&Poor's article

by:


several basic problems

1. Why would an independent Tibet »
2. Why the Chinese government does not want Tibetan independence »
3. Tibet the Chinese Government have any dissatisfaction »
4. After the independence of Tibet intend to do » For example, pro-regime which country » Which country hostile regime » How to develop economic » And so on
5. The independence of Tibet country, why they support »
6. Does not support Tibet independence of the country, why they do not support »
7. Many foreigners from the Tibetan side, the reasons for that » 7

this problem is I most want to know, but I can not find the answer.


almost daily to see Tibet's post. Some very professional, some very indignant, but I always look at do not know. I do not know where Xiang Liaoxiang later, on the last summed up by seven issues.

but I do not know why we are not to discuss them. Do not know of special interest politics, will not have these seven questions. Is not too simple no need to discuss the » Forum is not like the game "236 K What is the"same level of problems »

game forum was also to write what 236 K of the entry posts, as a political forum not see the "entry"level? » After all, not all read the news network throughout the day on the political forum of the day, I believe that such a person to me there should be many, the current gun smoke, do not see the truth of things.

Hawking is a physicist, he is basically on the things ordinary people do not understand, but he also wrote easy-to-understand "A Brief History of Time"such popular science books. On the Tibet issue to see online Zhanhuofenfei, I always think that if there are "G&Poor's"articles like the first answer some basic questions to the more political it is not very understanding of the people.


rabbit and Dahui Lang

"G&Poor's,"the article has two advantages. The first advantage is that values can be avoided judgement.

Wang Xiaobo said, the judge did not compare the value of a more simple matter, one of the rabbit, Tai Huilang bad, the mother rabbit good. But there are

Dahui Lang Dahui Lang of value judgement, the mother rabbit will be the mother rabbit judgement. So just judgement of no use, everyone has a different judgement. But things will not change that fact.

fact is: the rabbit can satisfy the appetite Dahui Lang. Mother rabbits to meet the sexual desire of the rabbit - of course the rabbit to stress that it is pure feelings, Dahui Lang can not argue he actually loved the rabbit - These are the first details of whether it is important that the existence of such an interest This interest is the fact itself. And the fact that there is only one, and then to the role of different people (small animals) who have a number of judgement and perspective. The facts first, and after the judgement.

on the Tibet issue I want to know is that this fact. But this search and not hard facts.


rope combat capability

Another advantage is that the people who are Paizhuan, Reply More to the "combat capability."

10 "here"and 10 "other side"of people, each of the numerous posts fight each other. How to win? »

Strategy First, the 10 professional articles 10 people attacked each other. But other people do not quite understand the political (such as me) do not understand all to see. The strategy, there are 80 individual bystanders, one of the "G&Poor's,"the article to them, so that they understand politics, they joined their camp. I think the strategy more effectively.

rabbit can be written to 10,000 papers denounced the cruel Dahui Lang, Dahui Lang can also write to 10,000 papers on the inevitability of the law of the jungle. But as a spectator, I want to see a simple article on the popularity of the facts than to see 20,000 more combat Xiwen of thing. For those who are conquests, I think that attacked each other with the 10 individuals, not cozy up to another 80 individuals. (Of course the premise is the fact that there are themselves self-confidence)


good example

have seen good "G&Poor's,"the article. And vegetables first wrote a message:Spielberg, the Olympic and oil

African brothers are our brothers? » The United States is a very humane? Humanitarian » This is the emotional value judgement, similar to that of the mother rabbit rabbit good lovely, think Dahui Lang is abhorrent. However, the first and vegetables is another dimension of oil - interests.

I like to read this article. First, it better understand and brief a number of basic common sense, for me this political blindness is a good foundation for reading material. Secondly, it does not involve value judgments, only the interest on them (so there will not be a lot of exclamation points of the sentence, special afraid to see such a sentence, Yan Yun). In this way, readers will be able to leave room for thought: The fact is that children matter, as good or bad, to its own judgement.

there are also quite interesting article, just talking about a problem I would like to know "a lot of foreigners from the Tibetan side, the reasons for that?"

from the recent Tibet/torch incident on how to understand the world
Author: Members of the Public


difficulties

even in the presence of "G&Poor's,"the article, we can not To answer all questions. The same is the first and vegetables

original link:http://wfwfang.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!66338926106EFDF6!2727.entry

No comments: